In its latest updates, the SEC seeks to adjust the complaint against Binance, alleviating the immediate pressure for a court ruling regarding the status of token securities.
In Brief
The SEC has just notified Binance about its intent to amend its Complaint by including 'Third Party Crypto Asset Securities' as detailed in a prior Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 172. This change alleviates the immediate necessity for the Court's ruling on the validity of allegations concerning the tokens.

The cryptocurrency exchange has received notice from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its intention to modify the existing Complaint, which now includes 'Third Party Crypto Asset Securities.' SEC This strategic amendment, submitted in response to the court's directive on July 9, was aimed at facilitating ongoing discussions between the SEC and Binance, culminating in a joint proposal due by July 29. This document will likely provide a timeline for future proceedings, including any amendments to the original complaint. Binance The SEC's decision regarding the classification of assets may reduce the urgency for a court determination on whether tokens like ADA, MATIC, FIL, ATOM, SAND, MANA, ALGO, AXS, and COTI fall under the securities category.
In previous statements, the SEC contended that the cryptocurrencies listed on Binance should be designated as securities based on the Howey test, which helps define investment contracts. The recent push to exclude these crypto assets from being labeled as securities may signal a shift in regulatory perceptions, potentially leading to clearer guidelines for the cryptocurrency landscape in the U.S. SOL This legal update is part of a lawsuit that was initially launched in June 2023. The latest motion emerges in light of the court’s order, encouraging dialogue and collaborative filings from both the SEC and Binance.
The SEC's ruling on ConsenSys’s Ethereum 2.0 marks a promising shift in the regulatory approach toward cryptocurrencies, indicating that they will not pursue legal action over the classification of ETH as a security.
In the United States, securities and commodities are regulated differently by various governmental entities. For cryptocurrencies, determining whether an asset is categorized as one of these financial instruments has far-reaching consequences for its trade, listing, and potential legal repercussions for non-compliance.
By deciding not to press charges against ConsenSys in relation to Ethereum 2.0, the SEC has offered a positive signal to Ethereum developers, tech providers, and other stakeholders, hinting at an improving regulatory climate for their endeavors.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is reminding users that the information available on this page does not qualify as legal, fiscal, or investment advice. It is crucial to only invest amounts that you can afford to lose and to seek professional financial guidance if uncertainties arise. To acquire more relevant details, we recommend reviewing the terms and conditions along with the support pages offered by the issuer. MetaversePost strives for accuracy in reporting but warns that market conditions can change unexpectedly.
Recently, the SEC also finalized its investigation Alisa, a committed journalist at Cryptocurrencylistings, focuses on cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investment strategies, and the vast world of Web3. With an astute awareness of emerging technologies and trends, she provides in-depth analysis to keep readers engaged in the fast-paced realm of digital finance.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines JetBrains has made its Mellum AI model available to the public as open-source for cloud-based code completion, now accessible through Hugging Face.