Elon Musk is in favor of California's initiative for AI safety through Senate Bill 1047, although Vitalik Buterin raises alarms about potential drawbacks for open-source models.

In a recent social media post on the platform X, Elon Musk shared his beliefs regarding California's Senate Bill 1047, also known as the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act. Elon Musk Musk, a long-time proponent of AI regulations for over two decades, highlighted the need for such oversight in technologies that may pose risks to society.

Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, responded with reservations about the bill's implications for open-source models, urging for more substantial justification. He pointed out that earlier drafts of the bill included a stipulation for complete shutdowns, which contradicted the principles of open-source models, though this part has now been retracted. Vitalik Buterin Buterin also mentioned that some advocates for AI safety endorse restrictions on open-weight models. He suggested that a more generous interpretation of the bill might aim for mandatory safety assessments, which, if revealing harmful traits or functionality, could bar those models from public launch.

Senate Bill 1047 is designed to form a regulatory structure for large AI models that exceed specific computational and financial metrics. It holds developers accountable for how their models are used or altered after release. Prior to any training, developers must affirm that their models will not facilitate any 'hazardous functions' and incorporate various preventative measures. A new 'frontier model division' will oversee compliance with these new standards and provide guidance on AI legislation.

SB 1047 Faces Criticism from AI Sector as California Assembly Vote Looms

The introduction of SB 1047 has generated intense debates within the tech sector, with numerous leading AI firms and organizations expressing their apprehensions regarding its potential impact on innovation and operational diversity. High-profile groups like AI research institutions, alongside various California Congressional members, have publicly opposed the legislation. They contend that AI regulations should be established at the federal level rather than through a patchwork of state regulations. In light of the industry's feedback, the bill has undergone multiple revisions to balance these concerns while maintaining its core objectives. OpenAI and AI safety and research company Anthropic The California Senate approved Bill 1047 back in May, and it’s on the docket for a vote in the California Assembly this August. If it passes there, it will only need Governor Gavin Newsom’s signature to become law in the state.

Please be aware that the information contained in this article is not intended to serve as legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. It’s crucial to invest only what you can afford to lose and seek independent financial guidance should you have any uncertainties. For more comprehensive details, we recommend consulting the terms and conditions along with the help and support pages from the issuer or advertiser. MetaversePost strives to provide accurate and impartial reporting, but please note that market conditions can shift unexpectedly.