Coinbase Puts Up a Fight Against the SEC in Court, Asserting That Tokens Listed Are Not Classified as Securities
In Brief
Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Manhattan Federal Court requested clarification from Coinbase regarding whether the tokens available on its exchange can be classified as securities.
During the court session on Wednesday, Federal Judge Katherine Polk Failla asked representatives from Coinbase about how tokens listed on their platform should be categorized. Specifically, she wanted to know if they could fall under the definition of securities. Coinbase Judge Katherine Polk Failla attentively listened to the arguments from both sides, focusing her inquiries on the legal definitions regarding securities. She examined the specific features of various tokens traded on exchanges like Coinbase to determine if they fit within the criteria established by regulatory authorities for investment contracts.
Although the Securities Act of 1933 offers a description of what constitutes a “security,” many experts reference a significant Supreme Court decision to evaluate if a particular investment item qualifies as a security. A pivotal factor is whether individuals are entering into an investment with the expectation of earning profits from a shared venture. crypto tokens Coinbase contends that cryptocurrency assets, unlike traditional stocks or bonds, do not satisfy the requirements to be categorized as investment contracts. This perspective is widely embraced within the cryptocurrency sector.
William Savitt, representing Coinbase, made it clear that the company does not claim that every token on its platform is immune from being classified as a security.
Throughout the hearing, he examined how securities are defined, highlighting a notable distinction between ‘investing in Beanie Baby Inc.’ versus just buying Beanie Babies, referencing a nostalgic 90s phenomenon where Americans bought toys hoping they would appreciate in value.
He also mentioned that Coinbase does align with the SEC in the sense that a formal contract between a buyer and a seller isn’t a prerequisite for what constitutes an investment contract. Yet, simply reading white papers or other project materials doesn’t inherently suggest that buyers are entering investment contracts.
Savitt argued against the SEC's position, proposing that simply trading tokens on Coinbase should not qualify as investment contracts based on the promises made by token projects. He challenged the notion that just because buyers expect a token’s price to rise, the transaction automatically equates to an investment contract.
"An enforceable promise must be present; that's the absolute minimum we can regard as an investment contract,\" stated Coinbase’s attorney, William Savitt.
He pointed out an essential difference between blockchain tokens and traditional securities. Unlike stocks, where purchasing them – either directly from the issuer or on secondary markets – grants all associated rights, this principle does not apply universally to tokens, which exposes a fundamental variance.
Patrick Costello, an assistant chief litigation counsel for the SEC, contended that the cryptocurrency tokens at the center of the case contribute to a wider “enterprise,” comparing them to an investment contract. He stressed that as the network or ecosystem’s worth increases, so does the value of its linked token.
Yet, the Judge conveyed her concerns to SEC attorneys regarding the agency’s aim to broaden the definition of what constitutes a security.
The SEC argued that buyers of digital assets, even when trading on platforms like Coinbase, treat the tokens akin to purchasing shares or bonds. However, Coinbase’s legal team countered this claim, stating that token buyers did not obtain any contractual rights to profits from a collective endeavor.
Contentious Discussions Between SEC and Coinbase on Bitcoin and Previous Legal Rulings
In the course of the discussion, attorneys from the SEC and Coinbase clashed over whether Bitcoin qualifies as a security. During the opening phase of the hearing, SEC’s Patrick Costello argued that Bitcoin does not meet security standards because it lacks a clear ecosystem, implying that purchasers aren't investing in a collective venture. In rebuttal, Coinbase’s Savitt, during his closing remarks, asserted that Bitcoin does indeed possess an ecosystem similar to that of other cryptocurrencies.
Judges in previous cases have taken firm positions on determining whether the cryptocurrencies in question should be classified as securities. Likewise, Judge Katherine Polk Failla asked Coinbase’s attorney about differing interpretations. In a recent judgment, Judge Analisa Torres from the New York District Court found that certain algorithmic sales of XRP by Ripple did not violate securities regulations due to the nature of a blind bidding approach.
She also ruled that other direct sales of XRP to institutional investors were classified as securities, marking a mixed result for the SEC. Bitcoin SEC Takes Aim at Coinbase’s Staking Program
As part of its legal action, the SEC has also targeted Coinbase’s staking program. This initiative enables users to pool their assets to help validate activities across blockchain networks, earning commissions, and providing them with rewards. The SEC argues that this program should have been officially registered with the agency. well-known Ripple case While I’m not going to provide a blow-by-blow account of the hearing, it’s clear that Judge Failla was immediately engaged.
In a paraphrase from the lead attorney: The “DeFi community” provided a comprehensive amicus brief clarifying what staking entails and how the wallet functions...
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has initiated a lawsuit against Coinbase, accusing it of operating as an unregistered exchange, broker, and clearing agency. Coinbase is contesting these claims and calling for the case to be dismissed.
The SEC has claimed that Coinbase facilitated the trading of at least 13 tokens, including SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, SAND, AXS, CHZ, FLOW, ICP, NEAR, VGX, DASH, and NEXO. According to the SEC, these tokens should have been officially registered as securities. Coinbase, in turn, accused the SEC of a “regulation by enforcement” tactic. Coinbase’s The judge opted not to making a ruling immediately, mentioning she still has various considerations to process after the lengthy four-hour hearing. Should the judge deny Coinbase's request for dismissal, the case would enter the discovery phase. Following discovery, both the SEC and Coinbase could file for summary judgment.
Court Debates Future Proceedings
In June last year, the Please be aware that the information shared on this page is intended for informational purposes only and should not be seen as any form of legal, tax, investment, financial, or other serious advice. It’s crucial to invest only what you can afford to lose and to reach out for independent financial guidance if you're uncertain. We recommend checking the terms and conditions as well as the help resources provided by the issuer or advertiser before making any investments. MetaversePost strives to deliver accurate and fair reporting, but market conditions can change without prior notice. Alisa, an enthusiastic journalist with Cryptocurrencylistings, focuses on the intricacies of cryptocurrency, zero-knowledge proofs, investments, and the expansive world of Web3. With a sharp eye for evolving trends and technologies, she provides in-depth reports that engage and inform readers in the fast-paced digital finance landscape.
Blum Commemorates One-Year Anniversary With Honors for ‘Best GameFi App’ and ‘Best Trading App’ at Blockchain Forum 2025
Addressing DeFi Fragmentation: How Omniston Enhances Liquidity on TON Coinbase Vanilla Unveils 10,000x Leverage Super Perpetuals on the BNB Chain
Solv Protocol, Fragmetric, and Zeus Network Join Forces to Introduce FragBTC: Solana’s Bitcoin Yield-Generating Product
Polygon Launches the ‘Agglayer Breakout Program’ Aimed at Innovating and Airdropping Value to POL Stakers
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines Let’s delve into innovative initiatives that are leveraging the power of digital currencies for philanthropic efforts.
