Andrew Ng, a well-known AI thought leader, stands firm with OpenAI and Microsoft in the copyright dispute initiated by The New York Times.

In a recent development, The New York Times, a leading media outlet, has brought forth a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. OpenAI The publication accuses these tech giants of infringing on copyright by allegedly utilizing millions of its articles without proper consent in their AI model training.

Andrew Ng Andrew Ng, known for his contributions to AI and as the founder of DeepLearning.AI, empathizes with publishers who are anxious about how generative AI might disrupt their industries. He emphasizes the critical role of independent journalism in upholding democracy and believes it deserves protection, nevertheless, he aligns more with the arguments presented by OpenAI and Microsoft than those of The New York Times. journalism \"I truly sympathize with publishers who have concerns about generative AI impacting their businesses. I view independent journalism as a cornerstone of democracy and believe it warrants safeguarding. That said, I find myself leaning more towards the perspectives of OpenAI and Microsoft compared to those of The New York Times,\" he stated in a post on X.

Overall, my sympathies lean more towards OpenAI and Microsoft rather than The New York Times.

Among other accusations, the suit claims that OpenAI and Microsoft leveraged millions of the New York Times’ copyrighted articles for their AI model training. lawsuit against The lawsuit includes instances where OpenAI's models appeared to reproduce articles from the New York Times with remarkable accuracy.

• "Upon reviewing the New York Times lawsuit, I found it rather ambiguous as to what transpired and the actual damages involved. (It seems the lawyers for the Times aren’t held to the same clarity standards as their journalists!),\" Ng remarked.
• Andrew Ng advocates for the concept of viewing the training of AI models, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), as fair use that doesn’t require a license. By drawing parallels to human learning, he underscores the significance of allowing AI systems to consume and learn from copyrighted works, resembling how individuals access online articles to gain insights and produce new content.

That said, Ng believes the resolution of whether such practices qualify as fair use should ideally be left to lawmakers and judiciary systems.

Andrew Ng Calls for Clarity from New York Times

Andrew raised concerns about the lack of clarity regarding the technical processes that enable AI systems to reproduce articles verbatim, questioning the connection between these processes and the allegations. He points out that a clearer exposition from The New York Times about these mechanisms could have mitigated much of the confusion surrounding the lawsuit.

His viewpoint emphasizes the necessity for transparent and thorough explanations to facilitate understanding, particularly in the complex technical realms associated with AI. One can delve deeper into Ng’s comprehensive perspective on this matter.

Meanwhile, a lawsuit is underway in Manhattan federal court, brought forth by nonfiction authors Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage. They allege that their literary works were improperly utilized by the companies to train various AI models, including ChatGPT. ChatGPT The copyright infringement claims assert that the authors’ literary works were part of the dataset used in the training of OpenAI’s GPT language model.

These ongoing lawsuits may spur vital conversations leading to carefully crafted regulations and industry practices that balance innovation with the safeguarding of intellectual property rights. Andrew Ng’s appeal for clarity illustrates a pressing need for transparent frameworks to navigate the changing dynamics between media, tech, and law within the AI landscape. here .

In yet another update, OpenAI and Microsoft Please keep in mind that the information on this page is purely informational and should not be taken as legal, tax, investment, financial advice, or any other form of counsel. Always invest within your means and seek independent financial guidance if unsure. For additional details, we recommend reviewing the issuer's terms and conditions alongside their help and support resources. MetaversePost is dedicated to providing accurate, unbiased reporting; however, market conditions can change without prior notice.

Kumar is a seasoned technology journalist, specializing in the exciting intersections of artificial intelligence/machine learning, marketing tech, as well as emerging sectors like cryptocurrency, blockchain, and NFTs. With more than three years in the industry, Kumar has distinguished themselves by crafting engrossing narratives, conducting thought-provoking interviews, and delivering in-depth analysis. Their expertise lies in generating impactful content, including articles, reports, and research pieces for leading industry outlets. Combining technical know-how with storytelling prowess, Kumar excels at elucidating complex tech concepts for varied audiences in an engaging and comprehensible manner.

Blum is celebrating its one-year anniversary with accolades for ‘Best GameFi App’ and ‘Best Trading App’ received during the 2025 Blockchain Forum.